Consumer AI agents are software tools designed to do more than answer questions. They can break a request into steps, use external tools and apps, and carry out tasks such as comparing products, managing digital workflows, or booking travel. Some can also work in the background on repetitive tasks. That added autonomy may make agents more useful, but it also raises the stakes: to act on a user’s behalf, an agent may need access to personal information, accounts, or payment details, along with permission to make decisions or purchases.
AI companies are betting that agents will become the next everyday interface. But curiosity about products such as Meta’s Muse does not necessarily translate into routine use, or a willingness to give an agent access to one’s digital life. The Pew Research Center found that 51% of Americans had avoided AI chatbots, citing privacy concerns as a leading reason. Surveys cited in recent coverage also suggest reluctance to let agents read emails, rebook travel, move money, or shop independently.
For companies building or deploying agents, the question is not only what technology can do, but whether it solves problems people want solved. Adoption appears concentrated among higher-income, highly educated, and white-collar users, while many people place greater value on relationships, exercise, cooking, time outdoors, and spirituality than on using AI tools. That gap is a reason to test products against real user needs, and to explain what information an agent can access, what actions it can take, and how people can review, limit, or stop those actions. An agent may be transformative for some tasks, but broader adoption will depend in part on whether people trust it with the keys to their digital lives.
To read the full report click here.