In a Rule 1:28 decision applying New Hampshire law, the Appeals Court affirmed the entry of summary judgment dismissing a doctor’s suit accusing her professional liability insurer of improper settlement of a claim without her consent. Johnson v. Proselect Ins. Co., 17-P-109.

The underlying trial had resulted in a $5 million judgment against the doctor for medical malpractice, which the trial judge reduced to $4,050,000 based on a pre-trial payment by a co-defendant. Rather than appealing the judgment, the insurer elected to avail itself of its contractual right to settle the claim for $3.75 million, which was within the policy limit, despite the doctor’s objection to the settlement.

With respect to post-judgment settlement negotiations, the insurance policy at issue provided that the insurer:

. . . shall not be obligated to obtain . . . consent to settle . . . [a]fter a jury verdict, judgment or any other ruling . . . establishing . . . liability regardless of whether such verdict, judgment or ruling is subject to appeal or further judicial review.

These provisions created a contractual right on the part of the insurer to settle after a judgment without obtaining the doctor’s consent.

The doctor, who preferred the would-be vindication of an appeal, claimed that the post-judgment settlement caused her reputational harm and emotional distress. In the coverage action that followed, she asserted claims against the insurer for negligence and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

The Appeals Court held that the doctor’s claims failed as a matter of law for two reasons:

  1. An insurer’s exercise of a contractual right to settle cannot form the basis for a negligence or breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing claim against the insurer; and
  2. The insurer’s conduct (i.e., the post-judgment settlement) did not expose the doctor to any excess personal liability.

Accordingly, the Appeals Court summarily affirmed the trial court’s Memorandum and Order entering summary judgment against the doctor.

Photo of Jonathan Small Jonathan Small

Jonathan Small is a member of the firm’s Litigation Section and Insurance + Reinsurance Group. His complex commercial litigation practice regularly brings him into Massachusetts trial and appellate courts on behalf of insurance companies, real estate developers, and other businesses. His interest in…

Jonathan Small is a member of the firm’s Litigation Section and Insurance + Reinsurance Group. His complex commercial litigation practice regularly brings him into Massachusetts trial and appellate courts on behalf of insurance companies, real estate developers, and other businesses. His interest in appellate practice began in law school when, as a student attorney at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Public Representation, he wrote an amicus curiae brief on behalf of the AARP in U.S. Supreme Court case Warner-Lambert v. Kent, 128 S. Ct. 1168 (2008).

Jonathan has defended clients against bad faith and unfair trade practice claims brought under state consumer protection statutes, including the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act (Chapter 93A). He has successfully argued dispositive motions in federal and state trial courts, and defended those rulings on appeal. He has also defended clients in class action lawsuits and defeated attempts at class certification at the trial and appellate levels.

Jonathan grew up in the greater Boston area in Easton, Massachusetts. He attended College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, Massachusetts, where he earned his undergraduate degree and majored in philosophy. After graduating from Holy Cross, Jonathan served as an AmeriCorps VISTA supporting low income communities in Miami-Dade County, Florida. He then matriculated at Georgetown University Law Center in Washington, DC, where he was a staff editor of the Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy, competed in mock trial as a member of the Barristers’ Council, was named a Global Law Scholars Program fellow, and served as a research assistant to Professor Charles R. Lawrence, III. Following law school, Jonathan clerked for the Honorable Lynn Leibovitz of the District of Columbia Superior Court. After the clerkship, he worked at Goulston & Storrs in Boston before moving to Connecticut with his family and joining Robinson+Cole.